Li Hongyi vs SAF
Posted by intellisg on July 13, 2007
Comment (July 15)
- Chain of command might have led nowhere
from Singapore Patriot
- Li Hongyi Makes it to Financial Times
- Bloggers Remove Blog Post On PM’s Son
from Pseudonymity
- whats your story?
from A Xeno Boy in Sg
- The Li Hong Yi saga: the blogosphere steps up to bat
from theonlinecitizen
News (July 14)
- Singapore PM’s son gets army rebuke for e-mail gaffe (reuters)
- Singapore PM’s soldier son emails complaint to defence minister (AFP)
- Singapore Armed Forces Reprimands PM’s Son For Not Following Procedure (Bernama)
Comment (July 14)
- The Lone Tree Hill Incident at Lim Chu Kang
- PM’s Son’s Army Gaffe And Why We Have To Worry [This post has been removed by author]
from E-hung
- Li Hongyi’s ethical dilemma
from e pur si muove
- Punished for blowing the whistle
from Hear ye! Hear ye!
- Li Hongyi VS. SAF | Even PM’s son needs to have rights
- Of Emails and the Chain of Command
from Winter Is Coming
- An Autopsy on the SAF Email Saga
- In support of Li Hongyi
from nofearSingapore
- As a Citizen, I have a right to DEMAND..!
- Mass Whistleblowing Military-Style
from THINK HAPPINESS
- Li Hongyi’s Case: Bloggers Force Officials’ Hands This Time, But…
from Journalism.SG by Cherian George
- Hero or Zero?
from Winter Is Coming
- Jumping The Ranks
from SingaporeSurf
- PM’s son’s email saga a heartening development for Singapore
from theonlinecitizen
- Leaks, Cover Ups and Official Statements
Bloggers Remove Blog Post On PM’s Son « Pseudonymity said
[...] son) to his superiors in the SAF and the Minister of Defence. You can read about that here and [...]
testing ground said
The army is not for whims. It will do what’s necessary to defend the country. If they have to resort to lie, steal and cheat to secure the country’s interests, they will do it.
Even if it means killing innocent people in a war, or so i heard.
Without a clear understanding of its ruthless and corrupt nature, it maybe impossible for the inducted to be useful to its causes.
Whims whine. Whims don’t cut it.
But the strong will use their strength to correct wrongs.
In the absence of such strength, it maybe because the candidate was never suitable for the job in the first place.